Peer comments on this answer and responses from the answerer. If a violation of the responsible conduct of research has occurred, the sanction for that violation must be in just proportion to the severity of the violation. The party dissatisfied with the decision may request a statement from the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity within six months of the date of being notified of the decision see Point When necessary, a list of the research material, results and publications that, in the opinion of the investigation committee, contain a violation against or disregard towards the responsible conduct of research. A preliminary inquiry is unnecessary when: These works include textbooks, funding applications, project applications, poster presentations, evaluations of academic theses, and referee statements. This request must be justified and it must address the specific questions that are the basis for the statement requested.
The rector decides whether to initiate a preliminary inquiry. Term search All of ProZ. The premise of the RCR guidelines is that promoting the responsible conduct of research and handling alleged violations are primarily the responsibility of the organisations conducting research. This request must be justified and it must address the specific questions that are the basis for the statement requested. The Advisory Board must process the matter expediently, within five months of receiving the request, on the basis of the documents submitted to it.
Patents, Trademarks, Copyright Law: In its statement, The Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity may propose that the rector conduct an additional investigation if there are well-founded reasons for this in the material provided for the preliminary inquiry, in the final report of the investigation proper, or in the information provided by an involved party in its request for a statement.
The investigation committee is to submit a final report on its work. These works include textbooks, funding applications, ucrriculum applications, poster presentations, evaluations of academic theses, and referee statements.
View forum View forum without registering on UserVoice.
The RCR guidelines published by the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity are internal ethical guidelines for the Finnish research community and are used for addressing allegations of the violations of the responsible conduct of research in universities, research institutes, universities of applied sciences, and in other research organisations.
RCR, of good strengh, no murmurs, palpable pulses Explanation: The preliminary inquiry must be conducted within three months of receiving the notification, unless there are specific reasons to grant additional time for the completion of the inquiry. The current RCR guidelines have been applied since March 1, This allegation must be submitted to the organisation in which the alleged misconduct has occurred or is presumed to occur.
The rector will decide on the potential consequences should the allegations regarding the violation of the RCR be unfounded or malicious. The person alleged of misconduct, the instigator of the allegation and, if necessary, experts and other persons involved. Post Your ideas for ProZ.
Investigation of allegations
rr The investigation procedure for alleged violations of the responsible conduct of research involves three steps: Furthermore, the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity can also recommend an investigation if it has reason to suspect misconduct within the organisation in question. In addition, the reported violation against the responsible conduct of research can lead to other sanctions that the rector is justified or obligated to impose on the basis of, for instance, legislation pertaining to administrative, criminal, labour or contract law.
See the guidelines for formulating a request for a statement. Robert Copeland KudoZ activity Questions: In addition to following these guidelines, the investigations into alleged RCR violations also need to abide by current legislation. The rector decides whether to cyrriculum a preliminary inquiry.
If the approval of the thesis is pending, or the candidate has not yet been curriculum permission to defend the thesis, the institution can investigate the allegations by following an internal procedure, unless the researcher suspected of a RCR violation insists on an investigation according to these guidelines.
In addition to research and publications, they also apply to all other types of written works in conjunction with academic work, irrespective of their form of publication.
These guidelines are also cutriculum be adhered to, whenever applicable, when co-operating with enterprises and other partners, either nationally or internationally.
An account of the events prior to establishing the investigation committee, such as ivtae account of the research or the activities alleged to represent misconduct, as well as the evidence for the allegation.
The Viyae National Board on Research Integrity TENKappointed by the Ministry of Education and Culture, promotes the responsible conduct of research, prevents research misconduct, promotes discussion and spreads information on research integrity in Finland. Earlier RCR guidelines are used for handling of missconduct cases before March 1, The allegation of a violation of the responsible conduct of research must be communicated in writing to the rector or to another decision-maker in a similar position hereafter the rector.
Clinical Radiology Curriculum | The Royal College of Radiologists
If a violation has been uncovered, a reasoned assessment needs to be included concerning the nature of the violation towards the responsible conduct of research as well as a reasoned assessment concerning the severity of the violation and its frequency of occurrence d.
The investigation procedure for alleged violations of the responsible conduct of research involves three steps:. This decision must mention that a party dissatisfied with the decision can request a statement from The Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity within six months of the decision see Point When compiling the statement, the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity may, if needed, request a written response from the parties concerned and from the investigating organisation.
Skip to main content.
The Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity curricu,um, for well-founded reasons, initiate a further investigation without a request for a statement. Furthermore, the Advisory Board must issue a statement addressed to the party that has instigated the process, and this statement must also be delivered to the rector and to the other parties involved.
The person currriculum for the making the decision is the rector of the university, or if the university so decides, the chancellor, or the rector of a university of applied sciences, or the director of the research organisation. If the investigation finds that the person alleged of misconduct has not violated the responsible conduct of research, the person alleged of misconduct and the instigator of the allegation must be notified of this decision.