JOEL FEINBERG PSYCHOLOGICAL EGOISM ESSAY

JOEL FEINBERG PSYCHOLOGICAL EGOISM ESSAY

Newer Post Older Post Home. Nonetheless, they might contend that our other ultimate motives self-fulfillment, power, etc. Louis Pojman and James Fieser. Log In Sign Up. Wadsworth, , pp. Consider the following point by J. It is merely stating that if the logic is unsound at this point, given our own intuitions and knowledge of ourselves and given we are absolutely truthful with ourselves, no matter how embarrassing or disillusioning such revelations may be , it is only so because a good logical procedure for extrapolating from individuals to general populations has not been defined.

Log In Sign Up. Wallsten 2 ever responsible for directing your own actions. It’s hard to follow these arguments. Wallsten 2 ever responsible for directing your own actions. It is true that there is very little science supporting psychological egoism, yet this is not so much a product of falsifiable or outright wrong ideas, but a description of the difficulty of measuring empirically what it means to be human and to seek out our own ways.

Analytic statements —true by definition here empirical information is irrelevant and superfluous. March 14, at 9: Fourth, psychological egoism states that moral education must be teachable.

joel feinberg psychological egoism essay

Enter the email address you signed up with and we’ll email you a reset link. It is true that there is very little science supporting psychological egoism, yet this is not so much a product of falsifiable or outright wrong ideas, but a description of the difficulty of measuring empirically what it means to be human and to seek out our feinber ways. Wallsten 6 Moving to the second principle of psychological egoism, Feinberg again begins by attacking the apparent logical fallacy employed, but then moves on to a more substantial attack on the underlying context of the claim egoiam made.

  SPRINGER DISSERTATION VERÖFFENTLICHEN KOSTEN

I think the paradox is a successful refutation of dgoism egoistic hedonism, and I hope my analogies illuminate how the paradox is cashed out in everyday examples. Click here to sign up.

Is Management Theory Too ” Self-ish “. Well, this is rather puzzling.

Psychology is rife with situations wherein it is very difficult to measure some aspect of human nature, yet this does not give rise to an automatic discrediting of the entire theory that would seek to explain them. So I’m missing something or I’m misunderstanding the force of the conclusion. This argument might propose that it is a psychological fact that everyone is motivated by a desire to avoid suffering.

Steinblog: Joel Feinberg: Psychological Egoism

Psychological Egoism is the position that the ultimate motive of all actions is selfish. In some theories, logical essay are deathblows to the credibility of the theory as a whole think mathematical proofs, for example ; however, we are not talking about highly technical situations — complicated, certainly; not technical.

By Hans Bernhard Schmid. But, we can do this, and thus a counter-argument is born.

joel feinberg psychological egoism essay

It is merely stating that if the logic is unsound at this point, given our own intuitions and knowledge of ourselves and given we are absolutely truthful with ourselves, no matter how embarrassing or disillusioning such revelations may beit is only so because a good logical procedure for extrapolating from individuals to general populations has not been defined.

But, he cites a general example of where he sees a logical contradiction, namely in the case of instant gratification. Psychological egoism generalizes from the individual case to all cases wherein no person can be excepted from this rule.

  CURRICULUM VITAE MODELLO WORDPAD

Feinberg clarifies psychological egoism and maintains that there are several things wrong with this theory.

Psychological Egoism

He notes that this argument needs to make goodness and evil into metaphysical opposites like redness and nonredness. A long citation ojel characterizes such a life: We are not perfect, and therefore it is wrong to assume that instant gratification joe anything but a miscalculation on the parts of those who were seeking their own pleasure. Extending introspection to a universal level is necessary if we are to ever begin to understand human beings at any substantial level.

Analytic statements —true by definition here empirical information is irrelevant and superfluous. The second argument for psychological egoism [getting what one wants and receiving pleasure] is also flawed: Consider the following point by J. One cannot jole enjoy a friendship if the end goal of engaging in the friendship is the joys of the friendship. Wadsworth,pp. I would counter that the argument is no different here between the nature of human motives and the nature of consciousness.

It should be noted that this theory is not concerned with the well-being, or pleasure generation, of groups of individuals, and is therefore only roughly similar to utilitarianism, if at all. Egoists egoiem allow that pleasure or happiness [for oneself] may well not be the only motivating factors.

Unclear Logical Status of the Theory: For now, we should accept the premise as true.